Skip to content

March 28, 2011

20

Coldsnap: Aurochs Stampede Review (Part 2 of 2)

by Dredd77

Excited to give our giveaway deck a preliminary run-through, Jimi wasted no time in selecting Beyond the Grave to go up against the Red/Green might of the Aurochs Stampede. When we last scouted the deck, Stampede represented itself as a very straightforward beats-style deck with a tribal twist.Would it have the numbers needed to run roughshod over the recursive tricks of the set’s most complicated collection of 60 cards?

Here are our notes from the matchup.

Game One

Jimi’s on the play, and she leads with a Swamp while I trot out an early Highland Weald. Jimi only manages to add a Mountain next turn, while I spin a Forest into a Bull Auroch to get things started. Turn 3 is another blank for Jimi. For my part, I manage a Boreal Druid and Orcish Lumberjack for a bit of ramp after sending in the Bull for 2, and then things really start to pick up.

Jimi lands her first critter of the game on turn 4, and it’s no prize: an Orcish Healer. Thanks to my Druid, I’m able to live the dream of an early Hibernation’s End, and I buckle in for a hard ride. Next turn Jimi adds a Skull Catapult to her meager board, while I start off right with a free Boreal Druid thanks to the Hibernation’s End. I then attack with the Lumberjack for some opportunity damage. Jimi blocks with her Healer, then sacs it to the Skull Catapult to smash my Bull Auroch. Nice play.

Now turn 6, Jimi’s deck finally produces a creature that’s more than just nuisance in the form of the Disciple of Tevesh Szat, and its appearance makes my Bull Aurochs start to shake with dread. Back to me, I snare a second Bull Aurochs from my library as I continue to pay on the Hibernation’s End, then send in the Bull Aurochs and the Orcish Lumberjack. Jimi lets them pass, and she’s now down to 15 life. Next turn she plays a Gutless Ghoul, then kills off my Boreal Druid with her Disciple as expected. I respond by Incinerating the Disciple, and she sacs it to the Skull Catapult to kill one of my Bull Aurochs. Not good. After fetching a free Woolly Mammoth, I send the surviving Bull in for another 2, then cast a Tinder Wall.

Now turn 8, Jimi retrieves the Disciple with a Grim Harvest. I snare a free Aurochs, but Jimi immediately kills it off with a Krovikan Rot. Looking to avenge the poor fella, I go in for 5 with my Mammoth and Bull Aurochs, and Jimi’s now at 8 life while I still haven’t been touched. Next turn Jimi sticks Sek’Kuar, Deathkeeper, and now I have a choice to make. Do I go with the slow, steady pressure for a couple more turns by paying on my Hibernation’s End? Or do I go for the kill by letting it expire and cast the Shape of the Wiitigo in my hand onto my Woolly Mammoth? Deciding that quick aggression could wrap the game up for me, I look at Jimi’s hand. Two cards. I suspect that if she had the removal, she’d have burned it by now and opt for the Aura. I let the Hibernation’s End go, then drop the Shape of the Wiitigo onto the Woolly Mammoth. I then send the team in- even the lowly Orcish Lumberjack. Jimi trades the Gutless Ghoul for my Bull Aurochs, and chumps the Wiitigo’d Wooly Mammoth with Sek’Kuar. She’s not dead (2 life), but close to it, and I picked off that nasty legend as well.

Jimi’s turn 10 is spent recasting the Disciple of Tevesh Szat. I swing for the kill on my turn, but Jimi stuns me by killing off my enchanted Mammoth with a Dark Banishing. The Orcish Lumberjack slips in for 1 and leaves her on death’s door. I summon another Bull Aurochs and pass. Next turn, Jimi shows her deck’s remarkable resilience by playing an Orcish Bloodpainter, then getting Sek’Kuar back from the dead with a Grim Harvest. For my part, I play a Whalebone Glider, then send in my Aurochs and Lumberjack. Her Disciple snipes off the Aurochs, then she sacs the Bloodpainter to itself to ping my stalwart Lumberjack. So close!

Sek’Kuar makes his triumphant return on turn 12, and Jimi attacks with the Disciple. Knowing I’m playing into her hands but compelled to get rid of the difficult Disciple, I block with the Tinder Wall and activate its ability to kill off her Disciple. Sek’Kuar smiles, and puts two 3/1 Graveborn creature tokens into play, one for each death. My turn 12 is a blank.

Jimi goes on the offensive next turn, turn 13, and cuts me in half with one attack with the two Graveborn and Sek’Kuar. I look to stall with an Aurochs, but it’s picked off with a Krovikan Rot (making another 3/1 Graveborn in the process). Jimi comes from the brink of death to claim resounding victory on turn 14.

Game Two

On the play, I lead with the heroic Orcish Lumberjack, which Jimi then Death Sparks. Next turn, I play a Gorilla Shaman, which also gets Death Sparked. I finally stick a critter on turn 3 with Woolly Mammoths, while Jimi’s turn is a blank.

Now turn 4, I swing with the Mammoths, then cast a second one. For her part, Jimi plays a Kjeldoran Dead, sacrificing it to itself. I cast a Frostweb Spider after swinging for 6 the next turn, but then Jimi rather cleverly manages to kill off one of my Mammoths once her turn is underway. She pulls both Death Sparks back to her hand during her upkeep, then casts the pair of them. A Barbed Sextant rounds out her turn, and she passes.

I attack for 4 more on turn 6, taking her to 7, then play a Tinder Wall. Now on four land, Jimi leads with a Dark Ritual, triggers the Barbed Sextant (just to cycle it), and casts Dark Banishing on my remaining Mammoth. Following it up with a Krovikan Rot on my Spider, I’m once again impressed with the lethality and stubbornness of Beyond the Grave. Still, next turn I again engage the Hibernation’s End, and Jimi just can’t keep up with my march of creatures: a Boreal Druid, a Bull Aurochs, even a Giant Trap Door Spider. Added to them are an Earthen Goo cast from hand and my forces claim a turn-10 win.

Game Three

Sending that Jimi’s deck is a bit vulnerable in the early game, I take a gamble with my opening on game three. Jimi leads with a Swamp, I follow with a Forest and a Tinder Wall. Next turn (after Jimi’s blank), I drop a second Forest, sac the Tinder Wall for two Red mana, and lay down a pair of Bull Aurochs. Unfortunately, Jimi’s got the Death Spark for one of them, and there goes my quick start.

Next turn (turn 3), Jimi has another blank as she draws, lays land and passes, while I swing in for 2 with my remaining Bull Aurochs and summon a Giant Trap Door Spider. Jimi gets on the board with a turn-4 Balduvian Dead, while I add a Gorilla Shaman.

Both a little land-shy, Jimi’s turn 5 consists of placing a Casting of Bones on my Bull Aurochs, while my turn is now a blank. A turn-6 Disciple of Tevesh Szat tells me I’m going to be in for a long one. I play an Aurochs and pass.

Now turn 7, Jimi picks off my Bull Aurochs with her Disciple, triggering the Casting of Bones (she discards a Mountain). She then plays an Orcish Bloodpainter and passes. Back to me, I swing in for 4 with the Aurochs and Spider. Jimi blocks the Spider with her Balduvian Dead, but the Aurochs gets in for 2. I play a second Aurochs and pass. Back to her, she sacs the Bloodpainter to itself to pick off my Gorilla Shaman, then activates the Balduvian Dead to turn the Bloodpainter’s corpse into a 3/1 Graveborn, which attacks alongside the Dead. I’m now down to 15 life. I fire back with the team for 8, looking to cut Jimi in half. She trades her Disciple for my Aurochs, so I cast Balduvian Rage for +3/+0 on my Spider to make up the difference. She’s now down to 8 life.

Now turn 9, Jimi lands a Barbed Sextant after I draw my free card from the Rage during her upkeep (Ice Age-era cantrips delay your free draw). Then she casts another Disciple of Tevesh Szat, and swings in for 2 more with the Balduvian Dead, leaving me at 13 life. Jimi has another surprise in store for me on my turn- a Dark Banishing for my Giant Trap Door Spider. I respond with a Stalking Yeti to kill off her Balduvian Dead, going tit for tat, and attack for 2 more with my remaining Aurochs. Next turn sees Jimi playing a second Barbed Sextant, then triggering both to cycle them and ensure that she gets full value from a Soul Burn on my Yeti, leaving her back up to 9 life. I swing in for 2 more with the Aurochs, then follow up by summoning Woolly Mammoths.

Jimi’s turn 11 ratchets up the tension, and I fear a repeat of game one where I just can’t finish her off. She plays a Gristle Grinner and a Gutless Ghoul, though I temper the surge somewhat by responding to the Ghoul with an Incinerate on the Grinner, preventing her from sacrificing it and gaining more life. I’d been saving the Incinerate to finish her off, but I can’t afford to let her develop either. Back to me, I play an Earthen Goo after attacking with my Woolly Mammoths and Aurochs. Jimi uses the Disciple to give the Aurochs -1/-1 until end of turn in order to lessen the damage, but she’s now down to 3 life. Next turn she retrieves the Gristle Grinner with a Grim Harvest, then recasts it. My turn 12 is a blank.

On turn 13 Jimi sacrifices the Disciple of Tevesh Szat to the Gutless Ghoul, gaining 2 life and making the Gristle Grinner a 5/5. She sends it in to thrash me, and I’m now down to 8 life. Taking advantage of the moment, she recovers the Grim Harvest and recasts it, pulling the Disciple of Tevesh Szat back to hand. Not a bad little near-loop, one more mana and she’d have been able to cast the Disciple all over again. Instead she casts another Gutless Ghoul and passes.

Still, it’s not quite enough. Between my growing Earthen Goo (now a 4/4), my Woolly Mammoth, and my Aurochs, all three of my creatures have trample. Swinging with all three, I’ve got just enough for the win. Another close one!

Thoughts & Analysis

Aurochs Stampede is about as straightforward a combat deck as you’re going to find. While I can’t say it let me down- two wins in three games, and the first might have had a different outcome if Jimi didn’t hoard removal until that critical moment- I also can’t say that it was the most exciting deck to pilot. Credit my opponent with some of that- she very astutely recognised the biggest threat the deck could present would be a herd of Aurochs rumbling in, and did everything she could to disrupt me. It would be fair to say, then, that this deck is only as strong as the creatures you’re able to stick, and even many of those aren’t the most exciting of options.

Although it was pitifully poor on removal, the other noncreature spells did a fine job here. Both of the deck’s rares- Shape of the Wiitigo and Hibernation’s End- were solid performers, and had tremendous impact on the game. Whatever selection committee opted to include those gets added points for fun.

Hits: Tribal theme adds a fun twist on a somewhat uninspiring beatdown deck; deck’s rares are fantastic and great fits here

Misses: Steep mana curve can lead to poor draws; light and cumbersome removal (two ‘removal’ cards are attached to creatures) rather disappointing

FINAL SCORE: 3.80/5.00

Advertisements
Read more from Coldsnap, Ice Age Block
20 Comments Post a comment
  1. Ben
    Mar 28 2011

    The big issue I noticed was how quickly the deck starts folding to a pinger. Both close games included a Disciple and I think this is primarily because of how heavily the deck leans on low toughness mana accelerators and the fact that one of its four tribal men has one toughness.

    The removal issue is also important, if a bit puzzling. I can’t figure out why they wouldn’t stick more than a couple of burn spells in a red green deck…I mean, there were decent burn spells in Ice Age block. Use them, Wizards!

    It was great to see Hibernation’s end in action, even if it didn’t completely wreck and terrify your opponents like its been known to do.

    All in all, I think my original assessment was correct: Fun, aggressive, simple and mildly effective.

    Reply
  2. troacctid
    Mar 28 2011

    You can’t bring back two Death Sparks in one turn with one creature because the one on the bottom doesn’t have a creature directly above it (it’s two cards up, which doesn’t count).

    Stupid graveyard order, right?

    Reply
  3. Ethan Fleischer
    Mar 28 2011

    Nice article. I think Sek’kuar only triggers of it’s controller’s creatures.

    Reply
  4. web8970
    Mar 29 2011

    I must admit, I am positively surprised how well the Aurochs deck fares. The ramping potential given seems to make a broader impact than I initially thought.

    Still, the deck’s beater most likely to show up, the Bull Aurochs, suffers a lot from having 1 toughness.

    The Deathspark somehow feels awkward as in recent years’ decks it is more than unusual to consider the order of cards in the graveyard. This leads me to the question whether there is a rule that specifially regulates the way cards are treated in the GY.

    Another random thought: Although not the cheapest guy around, the Disciple on the other end of the desk did seem to have an impact on your games …

    Reply
  5. web8970
    Mar 29 2011

    Just spotted the breaking news on the mothership …

    Actions true name finally is revealed … just as I feared and most of us guessed.

    Have fun!

    Reply
  6. Hireling
    Mar 29 2011

    Auroch’s + Whalebone Glider = LOLZ

    Thanks for the great write-up as usual.

    Reply
  7. Jon S
    Mar 29 2011

    I enjoy reading about the old sets being a new player it gives a perspective on the strategy there in and a look forward. Enjoying the play by play and the mechanics and gaining some additional insight to tey an be a better player

    Reply
  8. Jon David
    Mar 29 2011

    Hmmm… have you playtested this deck any more? It seems like you never really got the deck going,in terms of “I’ll go and stampede in with a bunch of Aurochs.” It’s a cool deck, and I really like Hibernation’s end (although I have the typical problem with Shape of the Wiitigo, being I have a phobia of such High CMC Auras.)

    After Coldsnape, would it be possible for you guys to do Eventide? I love those Theme Decks, and they are honestly some of the best I’ve played. If you do, watch out for Life Drain and Death March, my friends and I have had great success with those.

    Thanks!

    -Avid reader and fan,

    Jon

    Reply
    • Mar 30 2011

      Jon, you’ll be happy to know that our standard review process means that every deck gets showcased SIX times- three from my perspective, and another three from an opponent’s. You haven’t seen the last of Aurochs Stampede!

      Now for the bad news… sadly, it may be a little while yet before we get to Eventide. Although I am very keen on cracking into Lorwyn/Shadowmoor, over time we’ve begin wanting to review sets in expansion order. In other words, do Worldwake after Zendikar, because we’re able to highlight shifts and trends in deck design from one set to the next. There’s actually a method to the selection that goes something like this: we start a cycle with a new set (say, New Phyrexia). Then we grab a modern set (less than 5 years), an older set (5-10 years), and a classic set (>10 years old). This has been something of an ongoing evolution- early in the site we actually thought we’d want to bounce around and pick single decks out of all sorts of sets, but quickly discarded the idea as it didn’t seem as useful. That’s why if you look in the archives you find a Tempest deck here, a Kamigawa deck there.

      In short, to hit Eventide we’d probably want to get Shadowmoor first, and I’ve juuuust started looking into acquiring Shadowmoor decks. I’m as excited as you are to tear into them, and I’ll see what I can do about nudging them up a place or two in the queue. Thanks for your interest and support!

      Reply
      • bananarama
        Mar 9 2012

        I loved Shadowmoor and Eventide for the same reasons I like Ravnica and Planar Chaos, gender- I mean color bending. Between the hybrid mana costs in the former and the thinly veiled violation of the color pie and the latter, it makes for some really interesting interactions and plays.

        Also, SDW (Scarecrow Deck WIns)

        Reply
  9. Stric9
    Mar 29 2011

    I love reading about this block. It brings back so many memories. I mean, Soul Burn had the original kicker in it! There was also a time when Dark Banishing was the best in removal alongside Terror. And I really wish they would bring back Dark Ritual to turn black into the mana-ramping beast it used to be. One of the most powerful cards in Magic, often able to create a near game-ending first turn (which is why they probably won’t.) And the Orcish Lumberjack was just plain fun. I love it. Ah, the good ol’ days!

    Reply
    • Icehawk
      Mar 29 2011

      I could see them bringing back Dark Ritual but at a greater price.

      1 mana and some life or saccing a creature into 3 mana.

      Would be interesting. Sort of like Sign in Blood but for mana.

      Reply
    • web8970
      Mar 30 2011

      Besides … reprinting old Ice Age cards not only conjures up the chilling flavor, but on a more subconscious level the memories of days where there was much less budget running into development of MtG. This manifested in a much sketchier card design, illustrations that were not all that elaborated as they are nowadays and much more clumsy rules texts.

      Those were the days of the Duelist, the days where none of us had a mobile phone and the Internet was still far away …

      Reply
  10. Jules
    Mar 31 2011

    I really enjoyed getting to see how this matchup played out now that combat damage doesn’t stack. Gutless Ghoul’s used to be really hard to beat without an ultra-aggressive start.

    Reply
  11. Koga305
    Mar 31 2011

    It’s interesting to see the interactions between the weird Ice Age cards and the slightly less weird Coldsnap cards. Then you can compare them both to the new, very simple and grokkable new cards.

    Reply
  12. Prophylaxis
    Mar 31 2011

    Wow, a 3.8… Would a 4.0 be really different from a 3.8?

    Reply
    • Mar 31 2011

      Multiply each by 20, and that’s the difference between a solid C and a B-, so there’s something to it. That’s how we assign the ratings- a 100-scale letter grade, divided by 20.

      Reply
  13. Prophylaxis
    Mar 31 2011

    Wow, a 3.8… Would a 4.0 be really different from a 3.8?

    Reply
  14. Apr 4 2011

    I think this is the type of deck that will have a very strong appeal to some and almost none to others. Certain people like simple, straight-forward beats, large creatures, and/or tribal mechanics. That’s not for everyone.

    For the record, I think this would be a super fun deck to play. Once or twice.

    Reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. 2005-2007 Precon Championships: Tinsman Division (Part 1 of 2) | Ertai's Lament

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: