Skip to content

July 18, 2010

12

Opinion: On the Evolution of the Vampiric Species

by Dredd77

I wouldn’t have thought I’d have felt this way, but let me go ahead and get it out there as we begin: I’m perhaps starting to get just a liiiitle worn out of Vampires in Magic preconstructed. Black Weenie/Swarm is a fine strategy, but it seems like just a bit much on the flavour as we crack into the third Vampire-themed intro deck in less than a year.

For the longest time, Vampires had a checkered history in Magic. With rare exception, the early ones borrowed more heavily from Count Orlok than Lestat. Observe, then, a brief origin of the species, and some thoughts on the future.

Early Vampires

Early Vampires were all but devoid of the ‘sexiness’ we now associate with them. Indeed the first-ever Vampire, Sengir, seemed to set an early tone by lapping at some veins and arteries (though in a twist two years later, would have a momentary redemption).

Vampires: 1993 - 1998

Two years after the release of the game, Vampires would defy their early conceptualisation and stand at a crossroads, as Homelands introduced us to the Sengir clan. Possessing the same predatory will as their predecessor in the card pool, Homelands chose to infuse its vampiric antagonists with a healthy dose of aristocratic bearing more in line with the romantic notion of the vampire found in popular culture.

The Sengirs

Although the cards themselves reveal only Legends, Oracle shows them properly errata’d to be a Vampire, Vampire Dwarf, and Human Wizard, respectively. Despite her suspect appearance, in the lore ‘Grandmother’ Sengir is a Bathorian mortal who sustains her unnatural lifespan through the fluids and essences of young women. Bon appetit!

But the veneer of sophistication was not meant to last, and Homelands as a set was a general disappointment. Whether or not the critical reception of the set had anything to do with it, Wizards would put Vampires firmly on a track that stripped them of an urbane and sinister aspect, and instead emphasized their predatory (and sinister) image, as seen above. By the time Tempest rolled around in 1997, it was even possible to have the vampire degenerate into a form no longer even identifiable as human. And the horizon didn’t offer so much as a shred of hope…

Midrange Vampires

It would take quite awhile for things to come full circle, and indeed, judging from some of the cards released vampires hit a very deep and bestial low.

Vampires of the early- to mid-2000's

Yikes! From the gangly Treacherous Vampire to the more alien Mephidross one, it seemed a race to the bottom to see which one could be more bestial and hideous than the next.

Adding insult to injury, Vampires at the same time were widely marginalised, typically assigned as Rare cards with some flavourful powers but given no tribal support. A search today of Gatherer yields only 55 cards with a subtype Vampire, and bear in mind a large chunk of those were from only very recent sets. But why the relegation to the fringes? Why so little love for the bloodsucker?

Turns out, Wizards had crowned another to carry the Black tribal banner, which left the vamps with little attention or focus to go around:

They're coming to get you, Barbara!

Zombies! From very humble beginnings indeed, Zombies quickly became Magic’s Black tribe of choice, with over four times as many cards with subtype Zombie in it as Vampires, which doesn’t even begin to include other cards for Zombie support, be it Enchantment (Zombie Infestation), Instant (Cruel Revival) or even non-Zombie creature (M11’s Grave Titan).

At some point, Wizards had weighed their options, and put the Vampires on the back bench. It would take a stirring in popular culture, along with a back-to-basics approach from Wizards to generate the seismic shift needed to vault the vampires into the spotlight.

The Modern Vampire

A few years ago, as Zendikar design was reaching a close and Magic 2010 was getting underway, fortunes began to change for the Vampire deep in the bowels of WotC. The romantic ideal of vampirism which has periodically flourished only to die down again (see: 1994’s Interview with a Vampire, 1987’s The Lost Boys, etc… pop culture is a study in recycling) surged back to unlife in the form of Edward Cullen, True Blood, etc.

Twilight certainly cannot get sole credit, but it splashed vampires back into the collective consciousness and again paired them with a certain sensuality and aesthetic. Although the story of how Vampires overthrew Zombies and Demons and asserted themselves as the tribe for Black is a long one and well worth reading, the short version is this:

1. Vampires are popular

2. Zombies didn’t quite convey the full feel of what Wizards wanted out of Black’s iconic tribe

3. M10’s “back to basics” approach meant that nothing was sacred, and habit and tradition could be swept aside

 All of this lead inexoribly to the redemption of the Vampire in modern Magic. While the hunger remains, the beastliness has been replaced with that same sense of sensuality:

Vampires 2009+

Far from their ghastly origins, the modern Magic Vampire has become a far more attractive lot- they have truly evolved. (And is it just me, or is Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief a- pardon the pun- dead ringer for Brittany Murphy?)

Cradle to the…

So what can we expect from Vampires in the future of Magic?

First, I wouldn’t expect them to fade away anytime soon. Having a strong Core Set (M10, M11) presence means that in one form or another they’ll be sticking around for awhile. And while all of 2003-04’s Mirrodin Block contained exactly one Vampire, he was a flavour doozy (turning all of your other creatures into Vampires). We won’t know until this Autumn how great a role Vampires will play in Scars of Mirrodin, but it’s a safe bet they’ll be there. Thematically, Vampires had a strong role in Zendikar block, but set after set we don’t really connect Golbins or Elves with any particular set or story arc. They’re just always… there. You can expect the same from Vampires.

That said, there’s still a ‘novelty factor’ with the tribe, as evidenced by their overt presence in recent theme decks, as mentioned at the start of the article. Look for that to die down as well once the tribe becomes “normalised.” After all, it’s not too often you find a tribal-ish theme deck featuring Goblins (Scourge’s Goblin Mob and Lorwyn’s Boggart Feast notwithstanding).

It does look, though, that the Vampire is here to stay… even when Edward Cullen and his ilk fade into temporary obscurity.

Read more from Opinion
12 Comments Post a comment
  1. Ben (Twitter: Panahinuva)
    Jul 18 2010

    I dunno…I think Zombies are still my black tribe of choice. I like that vampires are getting some attention, but I really don’t like the flavor reboot and casting of them all as ‘sexy’. There’s different varieties of vampires, traditionally. Some seduce their victims, while some just fly around and jump on them and look scary. I’d like to see that represented, rather than just hoards of attractive people with pointy teeth.

    Reply
    • Jul 18 2010

      I’m sympathetic about the Zombies… I never really felt that they came together as a thematic and cohesive whole, though, the way the Elves, Goblins and even Merfolk did. I’m quite curious about the post-Zendikar Block portrayal, they were very well done in block, I thought, but being so story-centred I suspect they’ll weaken a bit (as they have already, with Nocturnus out and Captivating Vampire in as the tribe’s ‘Lord’).

      Still, I’m happy to have a reboot on Black Weenie decks.

      Reply
      • Ben (Twitter: Panahinuva)
        Jul 18 2010

        I always thought they did. They really seem to be built around swarms, recursion and killing things…But now that I think about it, those are all things other tribes do better. Maybe that’ll change in the future. Or maybe zombies will just get the boot. We’ll see, although the latter option would make me sad.

        I suppose they might weaken, but I don’t know if we can expect to see a whole lot of vampires in Mirrodin. In the original Mirrodin set, there was only one vampire because, in the story, there WAS only one vampire, with Geth controlling it. I don’t know if there’ll be more or less…but considering the set after it is apparently New Phyrexia, I’m guessing we’ll see a resurgence of zombies, since the Phyrexians love their zombies.

        Yeah, monoblack vampire weenie really was a force for a while.

        Reply
        • Jul 20 2010

          Your spoiler aside, Ben, you’ve picqued my interest in the books, and I think I’ll be giving them a read prior to October. : D

          Tangent alert: Back in the 80’s, one of the better Vampire movies to come out was Life Force. I loved this movie, and while I have absolutely no basis to go on for speculation, I can easily see that kind of effect supplant the runofthemill neckbiters and still be classed “Vampires” in the upcoming set. Who can say!

          That said, I always liked my Zombies, too. Ahh, Sarcomancy and Carnophage, where are you now?

          Reply
          • Ben (Twitter: Panahinuva)
            Jul 21 2010

            Oops, sorry. The Mirrodin cycle came out such a long time ago that I assumed that spoiling a little bit wouldn’t matter.

            Well, one was in time spiral block. So it’s still in double standard.

            Reply
  2. troacctid
    Jul 20 2010

    I might point out that M10 design predated the Twilight craze, so the vampire style changes could probably more appropriately be traced to Buffy.

    Reply
    • Jul 20 2010

      It’s actually rather difficult to know with certainty, but they likely all played their part. M10- which had a minor Vampire component- was in production earlier than Zendikar, but in one of the articles linked above, MaRo mentions that the addition of the Vampires to ZEN was almost a “stop the presses” kinda moment when the set had already left design and was into development. Did Wizards take the day off and go see early showings of Twilight beforehand? A mystery we’ll never know…

      Thanks for the comment!

      Reply
  3. Jars
    Sep 16 2010

    I’ve read this article about 4 to 5 times now, and i’m very much in love with it. I currently have a Pauper Vampire deck and a Drana EDH deck (a quick aside: I never liked Black as a color before i made these decks; i’m a Blue player at heart), and this article totally makes me giddy.

    I’d like to go do an Oliver Twist and ask, “please, sir, can i have some more?” haha

    Reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Innistrad: Carnival of Blood Review (Part 1 of 2) « Ertai's Lament
  2. Dark Ascension: Relentless Dead Review (Part 1 of 2) | Ertai's Lament
  3. Duel Decks- Sorin vs Tibalt: Sorin’s Deck Review (Part 1 of 2) | Ertai's Lament
  4. Shadows over Innistrad: Vampiric Thirst Review (Part 1 of 2) | Ertai's Lament

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: